Skip to content

Davey Winder

delivering award-winning technology journalism since 1991

  • home
  • about me
  • follow me on mastodon
  • privacy policy
  • Toggle search form
hand reaching into screen to pay hand reaching out

Ransomware: To Pay or Not To Pay?

Posted on December 3, 2017January 8, 2018 By Davey Winder 2 Comments on Ransomware: To Pay or Not To Pay?

Ransomware has fast become the biggest actor in the global threatscape, but should you always pay the ransom or not?

Ransomware has fast become the biggest actor in the global threatscape. Attacks such as Petya and WannaCry made global headlines and came at a massive financial cost to organisations not protected against the threat. Whilst there is plenty of advice on how to avoid becoming a victim of the ransomware scourge, the grapevine is much quieter when it comes to answering the question: should you pay ransomware ransoms?

Click here to read complete article

Analysis, Cybercrime Tags:Bitcoin, Business, ethics, ransomware

Post navigation

Previous Post: Use a Fingbox to help whack the KRACK attack
Next Post: Market-leading security products broken by Doppelganging attack

Related Articles

Big Game Hackers Smash $1 Billion Ransomware Barrier Cybercrime
Forget Passwords, This New Tech Is Nearly Hacker-Proof, 1Password Says Analysis
New iPhone Security Warning As Malicious Lockdown Mode Trick Revealed Apple
Gmail Hackers Leave Vital Clues Behind—Check These 3 Things Now Analysis
Top 5 Ways To Thwart The Coming Black Friday Ransomware Storm Cybercrime
ChatGPT Down As Anonymous Sudan Hackers Claim Responsibility AI

Comments (2) on “Ransomware: To Pay or Not To Pay?”

  1. Simon Loamaiu says:
    December 14, 2017 at 9:18 AM

    There is never a need to pay a ransom. The victim should just roll back to the last clean backup. This really is not rocket science. Paying criminals, especially blackmailers as that is what ransomware perps are, only feeds the criminal fire.

  2. Davey Winder says:
    December 15, 2017 at 8:44 AM

    Hello Simon, while I agree in principle there is a major flaw in this logic: namely that not everyone has a proper backup/recovery system in place or find that what they thought was an effective disaster recovery mechanism is actually broke. What about them? In these circumstances the question is valid, and the answer a lot less clear cut methinks.

Comments are closed.

Categories

Post Archive

Tags

0day Analysis Android Apple Apps breach bug bounty Business Chrome crime Cybercrime Data Protection Encryption Enterprise Google Government Hackers Hacking Health healthcare industry iOS IoT iPhone Malware Microsoft News NHS Opinion passwords Phishing Privacy ransomware Research Russia Samsung threat intelligence Twitter Update Vulnerabilites vulnerabilities Vulnerability Windows Windows 10 zero-day

Copyright © 2025 Davey Winder .

×
Cookies
We serve cookies. If you think that's ok, just click "Accept all". You can also choose what kind of cookies you want by clicking "Settings". Read our cookie policy
Settings Refuse all Accept all
Cookies
Choose what kind of cookies to accept. Your choice will be saved for one year. Read our cookie policy
  • Necessary
    These cookies are not optional. They are needed for the website to function.
  • Statistics
    In order for us to improve the website's functionality and structure, based on how the website is used.
  • Experience
    In order for our website to perform as well as possible during your visit. If you refuse these cookies, some functionality will disappear from the website.
  • Marketing
    By sharing your interests and behavior as you visit our site, you increase the chance of seeing personalized content and offers.
Save Refuse all Accept all
GDPR Cookie Policy